New Studies Show the “Crack Baby” Was a Media Myth Designed to Frighten Whites and Criminalize Black Children


losing-isaiah

When you hear the term “crack baby, ” you might picture the movie Losing Isaiah with the screaming baby suffering due to his mother’s drug habit.

He was the classic crack baby: disruptive, troubled, and fictional.

Crack babies aren’t a real thing

Yes, some children were exposed in utero to cocaine, but there is no scientific literature to support the theory of the troubled crack baby.

The story of the crack baby myth is one based in racism, classism, politics, and ratings. It began with a doctor who thought that babies exposed to cocaine were suffering unique, extreme effects that would only increase as the children aged. His report was ratings gold.

Doctors at the time questioned the existence

There were doctors who disagreed with the crack baby label and attempted to dispel the myth. Dr. Clare Coles had noted that many of the signs of a crack baby were normal behaviors for premature babies. Yet her rebuttal didn’t make good news.

“Coles’ findings were ignored, however, because they didn’t fit into cultural stereotypes and failed to feed the media narrative. Reporters railed about an estimated $5 billion annual strain on the government, and everyone got extremely worked up because the concept of the “crack baby” plays into sadly familiar ideas of race and class. Since crack was relatively inexpensive and far more prevalent in poor areas, it was convenient to use this fear to justify classist and racist rhetoric (i.e., “poor, black neighborhoods bring their problems onto themselves and cost the rest of us by doing so”), ” Callie Beusman wrote in the article Good News: 1980s ‘Crack Babies’ Epidemic Was Hugely Overblown.

In an interview to the New York Times, Coles said, “There are certain ideas that people want to believe that really fit in with cultural stereotypes, and it’s hard to get rid of those.”

The crack mother was the worst welfare fear

In her book Living Color: Race and Television in the United States, Sarah Torres, a professor of information and media studies, explains the racism behind the media storm: “As a composite “she-devil, ” the crack mother takes the image of the welfare mother, so prominent in the demonology of Reaganism, and fuses it with the sexually aggressive Jezebel. […] A particularly menacing image of fertility, the crack mother personifies an out-of-control black sexuality.”

Torres references quotes from leaders at the time such as Rep. George Miller of the Select Committee on Children who said, “We’re going to have these children, who are the most expensive babies ever born in America, are going to overwhelm every social service delivery system that they come in contact with through the rest of their lives.”

Similarly, a Florida juvenile court judge William Gladstone said, “These kids have enormous, physical problems, mental problems. They will go into a system that is woefully inadequate, woefully underfunded. They’ll grow up to be tomorrow’s delinquents.”

These children weren’t seen as medically frail victims, instead they were presented as a future criminals.

What the research really says about crack babies

The fears about these children were unfounded as current research shows that “[a]lmost every prenatal complication originally thought to be due directly to [prenatal cocaine exposure] was found to result from confounding factors such as poor maternal nutrition, use of other drugs, depression, and lack of prenatal care.”

The studies are not condoning cocaine use. Instead, they found that the actual health impacts are limited, and the children outgrow them.

Poverty and the “crack baby” label hurt the children more

Some researchers think that the low expectations of being a “crack baby” did the most damage. As Michael Lewis, a professor of pediatrics and psychiatry, explained to the New York Times:
“in a doctor’s office or a classroom, ‘you cannot tell’ which children were exposed to cocaine before birth.

That report goes on to say that poverty related factors were much more damaging on children’s intellectual and emotional development. Researchers have also found that being labeled as a crack baby negatively impacted the children as they were stigmatized with every physical or behavioral problem being too quickly associated to the lost cause of being a crack baby.

The problem was discussed in an NPR interview with Dr. Hallam Hurt, neonatologist and professor of pediatrics:

Host Michel Martin: Do you worry, though, that a whole generation of kids [..] was written off essentially because people believed that they weren’t capable of very much? I wonder if you ever think that maybe more kids could’ve achieved at a higher level, if people had not been so quick to believe that they couldn’t do anything.

Dr. Hallam Hurt: I absolutely believe that. And I think that one of the most deleterious things is when a child might have been identified as quote, that pejorative term, crack kid, in school. And often they were written off.

These children were most definitely victims though the culprits turned out to be more complicated than drug abuse.

Had you heard this updated information? Are you surprised?

About Alicia B

Alicia lives and took a semester of photography in a small college town that often challenges her resolve to live as simply and as stress-free as possible. When she’s not working, rereading the same children’s books, cooking, or wondering how crunchy she’s become, she’s busy updating her site, liciabobesha.com. You can follow her on facebook.


  • Kyle

    I never knew “crack baby” was a real thing. I just assumed it was a term, used as a joke, not a giant political movement.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

    • Dana

      Yep, it was a real political term. I remember seeing the scaremongering news stories.

      Thumb up Thumb down 0

  • Nikki AK

    I don’t agree with this at all! Where are ALL the facts?!. The effects of crack cocaine while in utero are severe. Children ARE left emotionally, physically, mentally handicapped and those children you “can’t pick out among other ‘normal’ children” have been blessed; not have any noticeable physical ailments!

    To the writer of this article: Do you know any children who were born with crack cocaine in their system? Do you know what it’s like to have a baby cry and cry and cry, and not be able to do anything about it, because what they’re detoxing. Have you held a 2-year old child who can’t walk and can’t speak, because they have severe mental delays due to the exposure of crack cocaine while in utero? Maybe you’ve watched a teen struggle with coming into their own, fitting in with kids their own age, and frustrated because they can not participate in school sports because of “invisible” mental and physical issues. Of course you haven’t, because if you had experienced any of this you would not have written this article.

    Thumb up Thumb down 0

    • occupiesthethrone

      So, just ignore the science because of your personal antidotes, right?

      Thumb up Thumb down 0

      • Nikki AK

        Ignore what science? Where are the facts here? This is no personal antidote; where they do that at? I’ve worked one on one with a child for over 14 years who was born with crack cocaine in her system, as well as, her brother, and two other sisters. These children are beautiful. Physically, they appear completely normal, but health wise they have a number of issues from seizures, Lupus, arthritis, cognitive delays, speech impairment and list goes on and on because yes, as they get older it gets worse. So am I ignoring science? No. The beauty of modern medicine has helped these children immensely. What I don’t agree with is the fact there are no facts here! No one in the world can tell me that what i have witnessed with my own eyes is not real. That it is fabricated for some “conspiracy” type theory. GTFOH. This article is nothing more than a blog by a woman trying to find something to talk about and sound educated by referring to science based facts without providing those science based facts. I need more than a link to a Wikipedia page.

        Thumb up Thumb down 0

        • Madpenguin

          I like how you went from caring for one child to 4. ALL of whom happen to be born addicted to crack cocaine and ALL of whom have multiple ailments because of it. Statistically speaking that’s monumental!
          I also think you’re missing the authors point. She’s saying the prevalence of crack addicted born babies is way lower than media, politics and some groups would have you believe. She’s also stating that the long term affects are not as severe for most, as previously stated. She never said they were nonexistent. Just not as bad as its been made out to be, and that a lot of the misrepresentation is due to the desire to paint people of color in a bad light to perpetuate stereotypes.

          Thumb up Thumb down 0

          • Nikki AK

            I don’t know whether to be glad or sad that you like that, because it is the truth. I care for One child; there are Four siblings, naturally they were ALL taken from their mother at birth, and YES THEY ALL have Multiple ailments because of their mother’s continued drug use throughout her pregnancy.

            Please understand that this issue, because it is a very real issue for these children, is very personal for me. When writing about situations as like this you MUST be careful of how you word things, state and reference facts. I didn’t miss her point. I got it.

            This issue is not a black or white issue. Race has nothing to do with the reality of the situation. Of course not all cases are the same. Not all symptoms will as severe, but that doesn’t make them any less relevant. I posted my opinion, as a black woman, who has first hand experience with a child born into this. I can’t blame the “white” media any more than I can blame the “black” community. Because while “they” are talking about it without the “real” understanding of what this drug is capable of, some of “us” are pushing this horrible drugs to the women in “our” communities who are carrying these babies. And please believe “they” knew what they were doing when they introduced it into “our” communities in the 80’s.

            When do we start focusing on fixing the issues though. When do we stop pointing fingers, stop blaming, stop trying to find fault in others and fix our own ish? When do we educate ourselves? It’s too easy to read an article and take everything for face value. Just because it’s in black and white (and on the internet) does not make it true.

            Thumb up Thumb down 0

HOT TOPICS